Submission

The Submission is the formal act of presenting a document, artifact, statement, or other entity for inclusion in the administrative or archival systems of the Tower. It is the foundational administrative ritual from which all formal reality within the Tower is derived, governed by an intricate body of protocols codified across multiple, often conflicting, Concordance volumes.

Definition and Scope

A Submission is defined in the Seventh Concordance, Annex Q as "any documented transference of an object of inquiry from a state of procedural indeterminacy to a state of procedural review." This encompasses a vast range of activities, from the filing of a Form NOC-4a to the presentation of evidence for a Verification of Closure, or the depositing of a folio for the Master Index. Crucially, the act of submission itself invokes a temporary state of "Provisional Reality" for the submitted material, marked by the application of the Provisional Sigil (Ψ), pending final adjudication or filing.

The Submission Sequence

The proper sequence for a standard Submission is outlined in the General Administrative Protocols. It typically involves: 1) securing the appropriate pre-submission forms (e.g., Form D-44a for a Guided Descent); 2) the physical or notional presentation of the material at a designated Desk of Lateral Correspondence; 3) the issuance of a receipt, such as the Receipt of Anticipatory Intent (Form OVC-22a); and 4) the initiation of a subsequent administrative chain. Failure to complete any step, such as an incomplete Form NOC-4a triggering Ordinance 4, results in automatic rejection and requires the process to be re-initiated from the beginning.

Scholar-administrators debate whether the sequence is constitutive or merely descriptive. The "Proceduralist" school, citing Clause 3 of the Third Concordance, holds that reality is conferred only upon the successful completion of the entire sequence. The "Intentionalist" school argues, based on a disputed gloss of Annex Q, that the intent to submit, once documented on a form like DRS-44a, is sufficient to invoke provisional status.

Types of Submission

Submissions are categorized by their intended destination and function within the Tower's ontology.

• Archival Submission: For inclusion in a permanent index, such as the Central Index or a floor's own Master Index. The landmark Iso 8812 application was an archival submission overseen by Librarian-Provisional Aris on Floor 412.
• Petitionary Submission: A request for action or amendment, such as the Submission for Concordance used to alter the governing Concordance of Petitions itself.
• Declarative Submission: The recording of a state or condition, such as the filing of a Closure Docket (Form V-C/9α) to formally verify that a matter is concluded.
• Maintenance Submission: Required for routine operations, such as the Form Φ-7 that must be filed by the Quiet-Masons prior to any work affecting Architectural Silence.

Jurisdictional and Indexical Consequences

Upon acceptance, a Submission alters the administrative landscape. A successful submission to the Index of Irreconcilables, for example, generates two certified copies: one for the floor's Master Index and one for the cross-referential Central Index. This duplication is not considered redundant but is instead held to create a "resonant validation loop" essential for the subject's continued reality within the Tower's systems. The Silent Expansion of 704-712 A.T. (After Tower) is widely believed by historians to have been precipitated by a cascading series of improperly indexed submissions concerning theoretical stairwells, though the original filings have been lost.

Controversies and Anomalies

The most persistent controversy surrounds the concept of "Unsubmitted Submissions" — documents that bear all the hallmarks of a formal submission (correct forms, sigils, receipts) but for which no record of the submission act exists in any log. These phantasmal filings periodically appear on shelves or in circulation trays, and while they are often treated as administratively real for decades, their ultimate provenance is always in doubt. A minor but vocal scholarly faction argues these are not errors but evidence of a deeper, "axiomatic" layer of submission that operates independently of the procedural sequence, a view formally rejected by the Librarians in the Fifth Concordance's Appendix Δ.