The Tower
Cited by 12 Concordances Compliant with Ordinance 4 Surveyed — partially ISO 8,812 — pending since 11,904

Taxonomy of Imperfect Duplicates

MS 0610.89 · Documents and ordinances

The Taxonomy of Imperfect Duplicates is the foundational 300-volume classificatory schema for all objects that are nearly, but not entirely, identical to a referent or to each other. Produced by the School of Particulars following the Aperture Storm and formally inducted into the Tower's official holdings under the authority of the Grand Curators in Cycle 17,342, it distinguishes 47 primary classes of 'almost-identical' objects, codifying protocols for their identification, handling, and archival placement.

Structural Principles

The Taxonomy's primary axis of classification is the Degree of Discrepancy, measured in Standardized Variance Units (SVU). An object registering below 0.5 SVU is considered a Near-Perfect Duplicate and is subject to the Doctrine of Imperfect Certification, while any reading above 0.5 SVU triggers a secondary analysis along the axis of Discrepancy Type (Material, Formal, Contextual, or Temporal). The resulting matrix determines placement within one of the 47 classes. For instance, Class XIX ("Spectral Echoes") catalogues objects identical in form and material but displaced in temporal context by 1.2 to 4.7 Standardized Heartbeats, whereas Class XXXII ("Substantial Phantoms") applies to forms that are contextually and temporally congruent but composed of a materially inconsistent substrate, such as a book written on pages of solidified shadow.

Integration with Wider Taxonomical Frameworks

The Taxonomy was engineered to integrate with, not supersede, the broader Grand Taxonomy. Its classifications are cross-referenced with entries for Spontaneous Manifestations, Paradoxical Objects, and, most notably, the Taxonomy of Unwritten Books, as many unwritten volumes exist in multiple imperfectly duplicated draft states. A protracted scholarly dispute, known as the "Annex War," concerned whether the Taxonomy should be subordinate to the Imperial Taxonomy or stand as a peer document. This was ostensibly resolved by Concordance 44 (“On the Taxonomy of Sustenance”), Clause 12, which declared it a "Specialized Subsidiary Taxonomy," though the Seventeenth and Thirty-Second Concordance maintain contradictory wording on its jurisdictional authority.

Procedural and Archival Implications

Operational procedures for handling catalogued Imperfect Duplicates are strictly derived from the Taxonomy. Class I-XV duplicates, characterized by minor physical degradations (e.g., a tome missing the serif on a single letter 'R'), are often retained in active stacks for comparative study. Duplicates from Classes XVI-XXX, which exhibit more profound substantive deviations, are typically remanded to the Archives of Imperfect Forms for deep storage. The most problematic categories, particularly Classes XLI-XLVII known as "Degenerate Whorls," are those where the act of duplication itself seems to have introduced anomalous properties; their containment protocols are detailed in Annex 7 of the Thirty-Second Concordance and overlap with procedures for managing Imperfect Silhouettes.

Disputed Classifications and Ongoing Revision

The most famous scholarly contention revolves around Class XXXVIII, "Volitional Mirrors." Proponents from the School of Particulars argue these are duplicates that exhibit a perceived will to differ from their source, a classification supported by observations logged during the Aperture Storm. The rival Office of Voluntary Correspondence, however, cites the Doctrine of Imperfect Correspondence to argue that any perceived volition is a misattribution of contextual entanglement, and that such objects belong properly in Class XXII ("Contextual Refractions"). This debate has prevented the issuance of a finalized Supplement for Volume 287 for over 300 cycles. Furthermore, the rise of Mirror-Stacks has presented new challenges, as some scholars argue their recursive duplication properties necessitate the creation of a 48th class, a proposal thus far blocked by the Consortium of Verified Copyists on procedural grounds.

Production and Authority

The physical production of the 300 volumes is itself a study in imperfection. No two volumes are perfectly identical, as mandated by the very principles the work describes. The master set, housed on Floor Ξ-7 ("The Calibrarium"), was scribed by 300 different copyists from the Consortium of Verified Copyists, each introducing a sanctioned, catalogued variance (e.g., a unique paper blend, a distinct ink viscosity). Notarized duplicates for distribution are permitted to contain up to three Class III discrepancies from the master, as per the Doctrine of Imperfect Certification. The Taxonomy's authority is such that a formally classified Imperfect Duplicate is considered a real, catalogued object within the Tower, its imperfect status being a property of its existence, not a denial of it.

See also

Referenced by

Readers also asked

Archives of Imperfect Forms: where is it?

Archives of Imperfect Forms are the primary repository for catalogued items whose physical or conceptual state deviates substantively from a recognized, certified ideal. Located on Spiral Archive 7, Sub-Aperture Ω, the f…

Archives of Imperfect Forms
Office of Voluntary Correspondence: who are they?

The Office of Voluntary Correspondence is the administrative body designated Clerk Registry A-7 and the primary recipient of all unsolicited written communications directed towards the Tower. Located on Floor 14,142, it …

Office of Voluntary Correspondence
Doctrine of Imperfect Certification: how is it conducted?

The Doctrine of Imperfect Certification is a governing practice of the Office of Absolute Registry, holding that no act of certification performed in the Tower may be regarded as absolute, and that this insufficiency mus…

Doctrine of Imperfect Certification
Taxonomy of Paradoxical Objects: how is it conducted?

Objects of paradoxical nature shall be indexed by their contradiction, not their form, and cross-referenced to all conflicting ontologies they simultaneously inhabit.

Taxonomy of Paradoxical Objects

Readers who consulted this also failed to find

Assistance

A Librarian is with you.

MS 9679.39
MS 8532.92
MS 1913.80

The Librarian considers the matter closed.

Typical response time: one Concordance. If your enquiry concerns a holding, consult the finding aid.