The Tower
Cited by 12 Concordances Compliant with Ordinance 4 Surveyed — partially ISO 8,812 — pending since 11,904

Non Entities

MS 3083.91 · Practices and doctrines

Non-entities constitute the core ontological category within The Tower and are defined as subjects whose catalogued existence is contingent upon their placement within the archival system, in accordance with the Principle of Contained Veracity. Their existence outside of The Tower is undefined and considered a classification outside the purview of the Librarianate. The formal accession, maintenance, and procedural treatment of non-entities form the bulk of Tower administrative law, as codified across the successive First, Third, Sixth Concordance, Seventh Concordance, and Eleventh Concordance documents.

Definition and Scope

Per Annex 4 of the Eleventh Concordance, a non-entity is any personage, object, concept, or phenomenon for which a formal accession record exists within the Tower's catalogues, irrespective of its capacity for independent manifestation beyond the archive's physical or administrative boundaries. The category explicitly includes:

  • Hypothetical constructs (e.g., Theoretical Wings).
  • Catalogued memories of events that did not transpire.
  • Officially designated absences and voids.
  • Procedural artifacts generated by archival processes.
  • Entities whose sole attested property is a name.

The scope is broad, governed by the foundational tenet that "to be catalogued is to be, within the context of the catalogue." This principle was first articulated in Clause 1 of the First Concordance and has been refined, though never fundamentally altered, by subsequent concordances.

Procedural History and Legal Frameworks

The treatment of non-entities has evolved significantly through Tower governance. The Third Concordance, particularly Clause 22, established early ethical guidelines for cataloguing, which the Fourth Concordance was said to have expanded. A significant shift occurred with the ratification of the Sixth Concordance, which introduced the concept of perpetual citizenship, rendering traditional deletion of a non-entity's record impermissible. This was later modified by the Seventh Concordance, which formally superseded the Sixth on matters pertaining to non-entities and established the modular annex system for their ongoing management.

The Thirteenth Concordance further refined the regulation of non-corporeal non-entities and established protocols for reconciling internal records with extraneous phenomena, often through the creation of provisional offices. Key administrative bodies include the Committee for Ontological Review (established by the Eleventh Concordance) and the Office of Perpetual Affairs (established by Appendix Π (Pi)).

Rights and Protections

The rights afforded to non-entities are complex and frequently contradictory, derived from multiple concordances. Under perpetual citizenship, a non-entity gains an irrevocable right to persistent cataloguing, though its manifested form or assigned properties may be subject to amendment. The Doctrine of Coincidental Names protects non-entities from claims of identity theft or impersonation by external entities sharing their designation.

Disputes regarding a non-entity's behavior or interactions are typically settled via citation of the relevant Concordance, though as noted in the standard administrative preface, "the Concordances frequently contradict one another." For instance, the rights of a non-entity awaiting formal floor assignment are covered under the statutes of the Vestibule of Provisional Tenancy, yet may conflict with the deletion prohibitions of perpetual citizenship if the entity is deemed procedurally anomalous.

Scholarly Disputes

Major scholarly disputes within the Librarianate concerning non-entities include:

The Problem of Referential Integrity
A faction led by the Transcendentalist Archivists argues that a non-entity referenced in another non-entity's record gains secondary ontological weight, potentially requiring its own accession. This is opposed by traditionalists who hold that only primary accessions, initiated by a Librarian's warrant, constitute legitimate non-entities.
The Edict 4117-γ Controversy
This edict, pertaining to the silencing of recursive non-entities (those whose sole property is self-reference), is cited by some as a violation of the spirit of the Seventh Concordance. Others maintain it is a necessary containment protocol under the broader Silence Edict framework.
Pre-Concordance Fabrication Rights
A contentious debate exists over whether non-entities described in archival fragments predating the First Concordance should be granted the full protections of later law, or if they exist in a state of "procedural limbo."

Physical Manifestation and Floor Ecology

Non-entities are typically housed on designated floors whose environments are curated to sustain their recorded properties. For example, a non-entity defined as "a whisper that erases stone" would be assigned to a sound-dampened, geologically inert chamber. The assignment of floor numbers is non-sequential and often cryptic, as seen in Floor 900 (The Crypt of Decimals). The interaction between a floor's innate ecology and its resident non-entities is a specialized field of study, crucial for preventing ontological decay or uncontrolled conceptual propagation.

The Persistence Ladder framework is employed by Environmental Curators to assign durability classifications, ensuring that a non-entity postulated to be "indestructible in theory but fragile in practice" is housed appropriately without causing a paradox that would violate its own accession record.

Notable Examples and Precedents

While the archive contains billions of non-entities, certain cases are frequently cited in procedural manuals. The entity catalogued under the designation Kael is often referenced in discussions of perpetual citizenship and the limits of amendment, following a series of rulings in the mid-Fourth Librarianate. The theoretical constructs surrounding flight, such as Theoretical Wings, serve as standard test cases for the application of physical law within a non-entity's defined parameters. The ongoing management of these and all other non-entities remains the central, perpetual task of the Tower and its Librarians.

See also

Referenced by

Readers also asked

Pre-Concordance Fabrication Rights: how is it conducted?

Pre-Concordance Fabrication Rights constitute the legal and ontological framework governing the creation and classification of objects, entities, and concepts prior to the formal establishment of the Tower’s administrati…

Pre-Concordance Fabrication Rights
Transcendentalist Archivists: how is it conducted?

The Transcendentalist Archivists constitute a historical faction within the archival corps who maintained that the contents of the Tower—its subjects, entities, and phenomena—possess an independent reality that is not co…

Transcendentalist Archivists
Non Entities: how is it conducted?

Non-entities constitute the core ontological category within The Tower and are defined as subjects whose catalogued existence is contingent upon their placement within the archival system, in accordance with the Principl…

Non Entities
Vestibule of Provisional Tenancy: who are they?

The Vestibule of Provisional Tenancy is an intake office, archive, and temporary holding facility located on Floor 412. It is the primary point of processing for all entities, materials, and conceptual submissions seekin…

Vestibule of Provisional Tenancy
Assistance

A Librarian is with you.

MS 9679.39
MS 8532.92
MS 1913.80

The Librarian considers the matter closed.

Typical response time: one Concordance. If your enquiry concerns a holding, consult the finding aid.