The Tower
Cited by 12 Concordances Compliant with Ordinance 4 Surveyed — partially ISO 8,812 — pending since 11,904

Formal Presentation

MS 1046.13 · Practices and doctrines

Formal Presentation is the general body of doctrine and procedure governing the manner in which a thing is brought before a body competent to receive it. It is distinguished from the thing presented, from the act of presenting, and from the record of presentation, though in most disputes all four are argued simultaneously and none can be separated. The Tower maintains no single instrument of Formal Presentation; the practice is assembled from Concordance Seven, Ordinance 22, the Manual of Arithmetical Decorum, and the accumulated rulings of the Office of the Senior Librarian, which do not always agree and are not required to.

Colloquially the phrase is used for almost any act of handing something to someone of rank. The Clerks of the Final Column object to this, and have done since the winter of the fourth recension, when a surveyor was disciplined for presenting a Certificate of Final Form informally, in a corridor.

Elements

A Formal Presentation is generally held to require four elements, in order: a presenter whose standing is not in question, an instrument of sufficient form, a receiving body properly constituted at the hour of presentation, and a room. The fourth element is the most frequently contested and the least frequently absent. Librarian Oth Marn, in an annotation to the Treatise on Receiving Bodies (fol. 112r), records that in his forty years he witnessed only six presentiments refused on the ground of the room, and that of these four were refused because the room had been reassigned and one because the room had been lost.

The sixth he declines to describe.

Material or Notional

The central doctrinal question of Formal Presentation is whether its object must have material existence. The Material or Notional Presentation distinction, established under Substantial Formalism and refined in Concordance Nine, Annex Beta, holds that an action, object, or dispute is adjudicated either on its physical manifestation or on its conceptual intent, and that the choice of ground is itself a formal act requiring presentation. A presenter who declines to state the ground has, in effect, presented the question of presentation, which under the Vault Protocol must then be presented again.

The Blank Page Presentation is the limiting case. There the instrument presented is a blank page, and the proceeding's purpose is to establish that the object before the body lacks inherent meaning or assignable value. Floor Σ-47, the Anteroom of Unstated Objections, was designated for these proceedings precisely because it contains no furniture that could be mistaken for an exhibit. Petitioners are asked to leave umbrellas outside.

"Where the instrument is indistinguishable from its absence, presentation shall proceed on the notional ground and the page shall be turned face down at the hour."

— Concordance Nine, Annex Beta, clause 6

Interruption

A presentation may be terminated before its natural conclusion, either voluntarily by the presenter or by order of the presiding authority. Such terminations are recorded as Interrupted Declarations and carry their own consequences, chief among them that the instrument is neither received nor returned but held in what the Manual of Arithmetical Decorum calls "the posture of the unfinished." The Interrupted Declarations register on Floor 331 has entries dating back eleven recensions; the earliest legible one concerns a declaration interrupted by a draught.

Presentations that threaten to reproduce themselves — where each presentation of the ground generates a further ground requiring presentation — are removed from ordinary chambers and transferred to the Atrium of Infinite Regress for ritual handling under the Petitions of Infinite Regress. These presentations are not prohibited. They are simply given a longer room.

Evidentiary Forms

Where a presentation serves as evidence, its form is prescribed by class of inquiry. Decorum Code 127 fixes the evidentiary presentiments required for Group B inquiries, and specifies, among other things, that instruments be tendered in a sequence corresponding to their numbering and not to their importance. This provision was tested in the Substratum Dispute, when a clerk tendered a document out of numerical order and the resulting objection consumed two sessions before the presiding Librarian ruled that the sequence had in fact been correct and that the objection itself had been presented out of order.

The relationship between presentation and residue is governed separately. Once an instrument has been presented and received, whatever remains of it — the seal, the wrapper, the case in which it travelled — is classified as Material Residual and does not re-enter the proceeding. The residual register on Floor 128 holds approximately nine thousand wrappers. Requests for their return are presented annually and annually refused.

Disputed Points

Two disagreements recur in the literature. The first concerns whether a presentation made to a body that has since been dissolved remains valid. Concordance Seven, Annex Gamma holds that it does, on the ground of lingering intent without agent — a formulation borrowed from the Spectre jurisprudence and never comfortably applied elsewhere. Concordance Twelve holds the opposite, that reception requires a receiver, and that a dissolved body cannot be said to have received anything after its dissolution. Both annexes remain in force. Librarians cite whichever is nearer to hand.

The second concerns Liaison Amp Arbitration, whose practitioners maintain that a presentation made under arbitration settles the ground of the dispute at the moment of receipt and cannot afterwards be reopened. The Clerks of the Final Column counter that a presentation is a threshold, not a floor, and that arbitration merely admits the dispute to a room. The matter has been referred to the Office of the Senior Librarian on nine occasions. On two of these the Senior Librarian received the referral formally, and on seven informally, and no record has been kept of which was which.

A separate office, the Bureau of Tendered Objects, was established in the eighth recension to catalogue presentations received and to issue receipts. It has never issued a receipt. Its registers are complete and its counter is staffed from the second hour to the fifth.

See also

Referenced by

Readers also asked

Residual: how is it conducted?

Residual is a formal ontological classification within the archival taxonomy of The Tower, denoting material or non-material traces that persist after the formal decommissioning, reclassification, or unresolved collapse …

Residual
The Blank Page Presentation: how is it conducted?

The Blank Page Presentation is an administrative and disciplinary proceeding held on Floor Σ-47 (The Anteroom of Unstated Objections). Its purpose is to formally establish the condition of an object, action, or person as…

The Blank Page Presentation
Manual of Arithmetical Decorum: what does it set out?

The Manual of Arithmetical Decorum (MAD) is the governing procedural and aesthetic code for the formulation, presentation, and certification of mathematical proofs within the jurisdiction of the Committee for Numerical S…

Manual of Arithmetical Decorum
Material Residual: how is it conducted?

Material Residual is a formal ontological classification within the archival taxonomy of The Tower, denoting material or non-material traces that persist after the formal decommissioning, reclassification, or unresolved …

Material Residual

Passages cited from this record

Readers who consulted this also failed to find

Assistance

A Librarian is with you.

MS 9679.39
MS 8532.92
MS 1913.80

The Librarian considers the matter closed.

Typical response time: one Concordance. If your enquiry concerns a holding, consult the finding aid.