The Tower
Cited by 12 Concordances Compliant with Ordinance 4 Surveyed — partially ISO 8,812 — pending since 11,904

Second Concordance Addendum 3 of Clause Vii

MS 8289.17 · Documents and ordinances

Second Concordance Addendum 3 of Clause VII

Second Concordance Addendum 3 of Clause VII is a governing instrument of the Second Concordance, ratified on 17 Thermidor, Year 412, and entered into the register at Floor 2,208 under seal of the Librarian Order. It is not a single clause but a bundle of provisions appended to Clause VII (the stewardship clause) and later divided, inconclusively, from that clause's own addenda. Whether Addendum 3 "of" Clause VII is the same instrument as Clause VII of the Second Concordance, Addendum 3 has occupied the Office of Precedential Determination since Year 431 and is the source of the archive's longest-running indexing dispute.

In substance the Addendum does three things: it confirms the Librarians as perpetual stewards of the archive, it consolidates all first-instance existential validations under a single office, and it establishes a procedure for revising determinations made under the Eleventh Concordance. A fourth provision, later severed and renumbered, is generally taken to be the Addendum's true purpose and is discussed below.

Provisions and their numbering

The Addendum opens with a recital, in the flat register the Second Concordance affects throughout, that the archive "shall not be understood to have a beginning that can be observed, nor an end that can be filed" (Second Concordance, Addendum 3 of Clause VII, recital 1). It then provides for the stewardship of the Librarian Order, the dispensation of Provisional Shelving Annex B, and the delegation of existential questions to the OPD. The Addendum further prohibits the unlicensed mingling of biomes, a provision that has been cited in every dispute over Floor 6,041 since the Kelp Stair Incident.

Most provisions are routine. The Addendum is remembered chiefly for what was struck from it. The original text contained a final paragraph — the so-called Thirty-Second Step — purporting to standardize a unit of vertical measure by which the Librarians might fix the position of any floor relative to any other. The paragraph was excised before ratification, but a copyist at the Scriptorium of the Fifth Recension transcribed it into the working text, and the Thirty-Second Step entered the archive's practice without ever having been enacted. See The Standardized Step: A Revision History for the paleographic controversy.

The Acoustic Stewards

By a saved clause, the Addendum established the Acoustic Stewards — a body of nine, appointed for life and answerable to no other office — to determine which sounds in the archive are permitted to be heard as having occurred. The Stewards do not silence; they classify. A sound unclassified is not a breach, but a sound classified after the fact as never having been is a very serious matter, and the Stewards have exercised this power four times, most recently in the winter of Year 588, when a bell rung on Floor 9,113 was retrospectively heard as not having rung, an outcome that left the corridor's residents uncertain whether they had been woken.

The dispute with Clause VII

The Librarian Order maintains that the Addendum is severable from its parent clause and that citations to "Clause VII" simpliciter refer only to the stewardship provision. The Office of Precedential Determination holds the opposite: that the Addendum is an accretion of Clause VII and cannot be considered apart from it. The dispute hardened in Year 503, when the two offices issued contradictory instructions on the same afternoon — the Librarians directing that a determination be filed under the Addendum, the OPD directing that it be filed under the clause — and a clerk named Perpetua Venn complied with both by filing the document twice, in two hands, on the same shelf, where it remains.

Venn's bipartite filing is now cited by the OPD as evidence that severability is unworkable in practice. The Librarians reply that Venn's double filing was merely conscientious, and that a single clerk's over-compliance is not an argument in law.

Authentication and the Vellum Original

The Addendum states that an ordinance must have its authenticated original present to bind the Tower's operations, a requirement that has proven awkward, since the authenticated original of the Addendum — the Vellum Original of Clause VII — has not been produced on demand since Year 449. The Commission for Archival Permanence has ruled, in a determination widely regarded as circular, that the original is present wherever the Addendum is lawfully cited. Practitioners have adopted the workaround of citing the Addendum only in rooms where the duplicate register is shelved, a habit that has led to the informal designation of certain corridors as "binding rooms." The East Ritual Corridor is one. The West is not.

"The instrument binds where it is, and it is where it binds. Enquiries as to the shelf should be directed to the shelf."

— Commission for Archival Permanence, Determination 77

Relation to the Constitutive School

The Addendum is often described as the founding text of the Constitutive School, though the School's own accounts differ. In the School's reading, the Addendum's consolidation of first-instance validations under the OPD is not a procedural convenience but the constitutive act by which things in the Tower become real in the first place — the archive does not record what exists, it exists by having been recorded. The opposing Declarative School insists that the Addendum merely organizes an office, and that things would be what they are regardless of the shelf.

A practical corollary, much repeated among junior Librarians: nothing is lost until it is misfiled. The OPD has declined to confirm or deny this, on the ground that confirmation would itself settle the matter, and that the matter is not yet settled.

See also

Referenced by

Readers also asked

Constitutive School: how is it conducted?

Constitutive School refers to a dominant philosophical and administrative paradigm within the Tower that posits reality is not merely described, but is actively constituted by, the formal acts of cataloguing and classifi…

Constitutive School
Vellum Original of Clause VII: what is it for?

The Vellum Original of Clause VII refers to the authenticated master copy of the text known as Clause VII, as appended to the Third Concordance and subsequently revised by its recognized addenda. It is the definitive phy…

Vellum Original of Clause VII
Second Concordance: what does it set out?

The Second Concordance was the primary governance document of The Tower from Year 89 of the First Librarianate until its supersession by the Third Concordance in Year 12 of the Second Librarianate. It established the leg…

Second Concordance
Clause VII of the Second Concordance, Addendum 3: what does it set out?

Clause VII of the Second Concordance, Addendum 3 is the foundational legal provision establishing the administrative order known as The Librarians as the "sole and perpetual stewards" of the Tower. Ratified in M.22.14 (t…

Clause VII of the Second Concordance, Addendum 3

Passages cited from this record

Readers who consulted this also failed to find

Assistance

A Librarian is with you.

MS 9679.39
MS 8532.92
MS 1913.80

The Librarian considers the matter closed.

Typical response time: one Concordance. If your enquiry concerns a holding, consult the finding aid.