Ordinance 42
MS 3807.85 · Documents and ordinances
Ordinance 42, formally titled the "Ordinance for the Containment of Unspecified Imminence," establishes the regulatory framework governing actions, behaviors, and constructions deemed to be "on the verge of becoming a problem." It is a foundational piece of preventative bureaucracy cited in disputes ranging from architectural overhangs to unresolved conversational pauses.
"Any condition, object, or circumstance which demonstrates a propensity toward future inconvenience, without yet having achieved the full state of said inconvenience, shall be subject to the provisional measures outlined herein."
Scope and Application
The Ordinance’s primary mechanism is the issuance of a Provisional Containment Directive (PCD). A PCD can be applied by any Librarian of Third Archivist rank or higher to "forestall the crystallization of potential into actual nuisance." Common applications include the pre-emptive silencing of a hinge that has begun to develop a squeak (but has not yet squeaked), the temporary suspension of access to a corridor that feels like it is narrowing, and the mandatory re-shelving of books that exhibit "preliminary lean." The famous leaning stacks of Spiral Seventy-Two operate under a permanent, blanket PCD ratified under Ordinance 707's emergency provisions.
Critically, Ordinance 42 does not require proof of harm, only a consensus (between two or more authorized personnel) of "imminent probable botheration." This low evidentiary threshold has made it one of the most frequently invoked ordinances in the mid-Tower administrative courts.
Interaction with Other Concordances
Ordinance 42 exists in a state of perpetual tension with Ordinance 4 (the Ordinance for the Prevention of Premature Conclusions), which cautions against acting on incomplete information. Legal scholars often debate whether applying a PCD constitutes a "premature conclusion" about the offending object's future state. A landmark ruling (Case 42-Δ.881) determined that a PCD is not a conclusion but a "managed postponement of conclusion," thereby allowing both ordinances to remain in force.
Furthermore, Ordinance 22 (governing spatial permissions) and Ordinance of the Ambitant Aperture (regarding doorways and thresholds) are often cited concurrently with Ordinance 42 in architectural disputes. The Ordinance of Contained Potential is considered a spiritual successor, dealing with energies rather than physical objects, though jurisdictional overlap is frequent and contentious.
The Quorum of Imminence
Enforcement and appeal of PCDs are managed by the Quorum of Imminence, a standing committee of seven Librarians appointed from the Department of Latent Affairs. The Quorum meets in a chamber on Floor 119, "The Anteroom," a location chosen for its symbolic state of perpetual entry. Their decisions are final, though they may be superseded by a higher-order emergency ordinance, such as Ordinance 88124 or a directive issued under Ordinance 707.12.
The Quorum also maintains the Register of Forestalled Events, a log of all PCDs and their outcomes. An analysis by Sub-Archivist Kael showed that only 18% of items under a PCD ever progress to a state requiring action under a more substantive ordinance, a statistic used by both supporters and detractors of Ordinance 42 to bolster their arguments.
Controversies and Amendments
The most significant amendment, Ordinance 42.b, introduced the "Doctrine of Receding Horizons." It states that if a potential problem is successfully forestalled for a period of fifty standard Tower cycles, the PCD must be either made permanent or lifted, as the problem has demonstrated an "insufficient commitment to its own actualization." This has led to the curious legal status of objects in permanent containment, which are catalogued under "Deferred Realities."
A major controversy, known as the "Crisis of the Almost-Stair," occurred on Spiral 309 when a PCD was used to suspend construction on a staircase that had been deemed "imminently incorrect in its angle of ascent." The resulting bureaucratic impasse lasted 12 cycles and was only resolved by the ratification of Ordinance 712-C, which created an exemption for foundational load-bearing daydreams. The case is a standard reference in procedural law seminars.
Physical Manifestation and Storage
The master copy of Ordinance 42 is stored in a vacuum-sealed glass case in the Central Scriptorium on Floor Zero. The case itself is subject to a PCD (Directive 42-0.1) due to a perceived risk of "undue atmospheric sympathy" with the parchment. The copy is transcribed every century onto paper made from the pulp of the Ephemeral Oaks in the Grove of Perpetual Almost, a material chosen for its "resistance to definitive decay."
A commemorative plaque quoting the Preamble is embedded in the floor at the entrance to the Quorum's chamber. It is polished daily, a duty assigned to the most junior member of the Custodians of the Provisional Order.
See also
-
MS 2125.07
Ordinance 888.45
Ordinance 888.45, formally titled the Ordinance on Sequential Invalidation, is a procedural statute that establishes a framework f…
-
MS 5328.81
Ordinance of Provisional Containment 12-G
Enacted on the 42nd of Cinder, 913 (Tower Reckoning), the Ordinance of Provisional Containment 12-G establishes standard procedure…
-
MS 6368.27
Ordinance for the Containment of Ontological Variance
Ordinance for the Containment of Ontological Variance, colloquially known as Ordinance 7, is the foundational legal and operationa…
-
MS 3461.31
Ordinance 7
Ordinance 7, formally titled the Ordinance for the Containment of Ontological Variance, is a foundational administrative text issu…
-
MS 2207.39
Ordinance 148.2
Ordinance 148.2, known as the Ordinance of Peripheral Cohesion, is a foundational but problematic legal framework governing the st…
-
MS 5104.32
Ordinance 71.8
Formally ratified under the emergency provisions of Ordinance 707 on 14 Thermidor, Cycle 881, Ordinance 71.8 establishes the legal…
Referenced by
- MS 2264.56 Ordinance 712-B
- MS 6368.27 Ordinance for the Containment of Ontological Variance
- MS 0182.17 Register of Minor Architectural Behaviors
- MS 4854.54 The Problem of Silent Floors
- MS 3158.77 Bureau of Premature Conclusions
- MS 2303.36 Problem of the Primordial Clause
- MS 1674.14 Quorum of Imminence
Readers also asked
Quorum of Imminence: who are they?
The Quorum of Imminence is a standing committee of seven Librarians drawn from the Department of Latent Affairs, charged with the enforcement and appeal of Provisional Cessation Directives (PCDs) and with the keeping of …
Quorum of ImminenceOrdinance 707.12: what does it set out?
The Ordinance 707.12, also referred to as the Clause of Latent Consequence, is a procedural amendment to the foundational emergency powers ordinance, Ordinance 707. It governs the ratification and immediate enforceabilit…
Ordinance 707.12Floor 0: where is it?
Floor 0 is the official designation for the null-axial terminus point of the Tower, recognized by the Third and Seventh Concordances as the theoretical foundation upon which all subsequent enumeration is predicated. Unli…
Floor 0Spiral 309: where is it?
Passages cited from this record
-
Any condition, object, or circumstance which demonstrates a propensity toward future inconvenience, without yet having achieved the full state of said inconvenience, shall be subject to the provisional measures outlined herein.
Readers who consulted this also failed to find
- MS 6920.08 Department of Latent Affairs
- MS 4371.34 Custodians of the Provisional Order
- MS 0299.10 Ephemeral Oaks
- MS 0264.08 Grove of Perpetual Almost
Because you consulted