The Tower
Cited by 12 Concordances Compliant with Ordinance 4 Surveyed — partially ISO 8,812 — pending since 11,904

Directorate of Spatial Reconciliation

MS 4600.67 · Practices and doctrines

The Directorate of Spatial Reconciliation is a division of the Bureau of Ingress Validation, charged with determining where a thing is when the Tower's records and the Tower's geometry disagree. It is not to be confused with the Directorate of Contextual Reconciliation, a separate body under the Directorate of Archival Coherence that determines when and whether a thing is, and with which the Spatial Directorate has maintained a formal and unresolved boundary dispute since CY 844. The two Directorates share a corridor on Floor 2221 and, by longstanding arrangement, do not share a lift.

The Directorate does not move objects. It moves the descriptions of objects, and then files a notice that the objects have been moved. Its standing seal depicts a plumb line falling through an open drawer.

Mandate and origins

The Directorate was constituted by the Six-Eighteen-beta following the dissipation of an entire reading room during the winter of CY 610. At the time of dissipation the room was recorded on Floors 1104, 1104 (Annex) and, in the index of the period, not at all. The investigating clerks observed that no shelf had fallen and no reader had noticed, and concluded that the fault lay not in the room but in the ledger.

Accordingly, the Directorate's founding instrument assigns it authority over discrepancies of position, extent, and adjacency, and explicitly withholds authority over discrepancies of meaning, which were remanded to the Directorate of Contextual Reconciliation in perpetuity. Clause 3 of the founding instrument reads, in the recension kept at the Surveyors’ Atrium:

"Where a holding is found in two places, the Directorate shall ascertain which of the two is the place, and shall reconcile the other to it. The other shall not be discarded. It shall be reconciled."

— Concordance 618-beta, Clause 3

No instrument has ever specified what a reconciled-place-and-discarded-place is to be called once the work is done. The Directorate's internal usage is "the surplus," a term it has never defined in writing.

Relationship to the cartographic offices

The Directorate works in close collaboration with the Bureau of Latent Cartography, which produces maps of floors prior to their accession. The arrangement is one of mutual dependence and considerable friction. The Bureau charts what it expects to find; the Directorate is summoned when the floors do not agree with the charts, and it is a matter of recorded grievance among Latent Cartography's draftsmen that the Directorate's corrections are returned without annotation, sometimes years later, occasionally concerning a floor the Bureau has since resurveyed in full.

The Directorate is further bound to consult the Directorate of Cartographic Review before issuing a reconciliation on any floor above 4000, a requirement introduced after the Incident of the Two Stairwells in CY 903, in which two stairwells on Floor 4416 were reconciled to one another so thoroughly that neither remained, and the floor above became briefly inaccessible from below. The route was restored eleven days later by an expedition of the Office of Spatial Reconciliation, which had no business there and has never fully explained its presence.

Procedure

Reconciliation proceeds by survey, attestation, and the sealing of a schedule. A clerk of the Directorate attends the disputed site, measures it against the ledger, and issues a provisional finding. Two witnesses countersign, neither of whom may have been present at the provisional finding; this is the so-called Rule of the Absent Second, and it exists because of Clerk Halvern Oss, who in CY 871 countersigned his own provisional finding on Floor 1877 and thereby established, for a period of nine weeks, a duplicate of himself in the west reading gallery. The duplicate was courteous and better at filing. The Directorate's report on the matter is three pages long and does not mention him by name until the second page.

Where a discrepancy cannot be resolved on the ground, the Directorate may issue a Form Ω-3 and remit the matter upward. Forms Ω-3 are the Directorate's only permitted instrument of deferral, and their use is capped at four per floor per decade by the Office of Spatial Reconciliation's Concordance 1012-gamma, issued in CY 901. In practice the cap is observed by keeping the fifth form on the desk until the following decade, an arrangement the Directorate has never described in its own procedural handbook.

Dispute with Contextual Reconciliation

The boundary between the two Directorates turns on whether a thing found out of place has been misplaced or has merely become something else. The Spatial Directorate holds that the question is one of position and closes the file; the Contextual Directorate holds that position is a species of context and reopens it. In CY 892 the Contextual Directorate issued an interpretation of Clause 3 establishing priority of accession, which the Spatial Directorate reads as an attempt to annex its entire mandate by glossing a single word. The Spatial Directorate's reply, appended to its annual return for that year, is six words long and is not reproduced here.

The Division of Contextual Anchoring has offered to arbitrate on three occasions. On each occasion the offer was accepted in principle and then withdrawn on the ground that the Division's own anchoring procedure was itself the subject of the dispute. A joint verification was convened under the Verification Cadre system in CY 928 and produced a report of forty pages, of which thirty-nine concern the seating arrangement of the meeting.

Current practice

The Directorate presently maintains eleven survey teams and a standing office on Floor 2221 whose windows face inward. Its holdings are not open to general consultation, though the Surveyors’ Atrium keeps a duplicate of every schedule it issues, filed by floor number and then, where the number is disputed, by the number of the floor it was disputed with.

Visitors to the standing office are asked to leave their coats with the attendant and to state, on entering, the floor they believe themselves to be on. The two answers are recorded separately. No visitor has yet been corrected at the door.

See also

Referenced by

Readers also asked

Division of Contextual Anchoring: who are they?

The Division of Contextual Anchoring (DCA) is a regulatory sub-directorate within the Directorate of Contextual Reconciliation, formally established under the provisions of the Seventh Concordance, Revision 4. It is the …

Division of Contextual Anchoring
Directorate of Contextual Reconciliation: who are they?

The Directorate of Contextual Reconciliation (DCR) is a regulatory sub-directorate operating under the Directorate of Archival Coherence responsible for the identification, quantification, and remediation of Contextual D…

Directorate of Contextual Reconciliation
Directorate of Archival Coherence: who are they?

The Directorate of Archival Coherence is the primary regulatory and adjudicatory body responsible for maintaining the integrity of archival description within The Tower as defined by the Axiom of Material Coherence. Esta…

Directorate of Archival Coherence
Bureau of Latent Cartography: who are they?

The Bureau of Latent Cartography is a specialized cartographic agency within The Librarians, formally chartered by the Seventh Concordance. Its mandate is to map rooms, corridors, stairwells, and other spatial features o…

Bureau of Latent Cartography

Passages cited from this record

Readers who consulted this also failed to find

Assistance

A Librarian is with you.

MS 9679.39
MS 8532.92
MS 1913.80

The Librarian considers the matter closed.

Typical response time: one Concordance. If your enquiry concerns a holding, consult the finding aid.